Segurança Internacional e Defesa em contextos regionais
Ementa:
O tema da Segurança Internacional e da Defesa está inserido em diversos campos das Relações Internacionais, das políticas nacionais, das sociedades civis, e, entre outros, no discurso político. Dentre as facetas, destaque para a percepção das ameaças e a construção de identidades, as quais orientam decisões e ações, refletem valores e incutem mentalidades. A proposta compreende um percurso por abordagens mais contemporâneas. Divide-se em duas partes. Na primeira, a análise de diferentes escolas de pensamento no domínio da segurança Internacional e da defesa. A segunda parte tem uma característica mais empírica e se concentra em regiões e nas instituições que buscam fomentar a cooperação. Neste caso, o enfoque se norteia para atores diversos e para a análise do regionalismo, enfocando o caso europeu e asiático, para então tratar, com mais atenção, do caso sul-americano.
Objetivos:
Conhecer e entender algumas abordagens nos estudos de Segurança Internacional e Defesa; Analisar com desenvoltura e argumentar com profundidade sobre a natureza dos temas de Segurança Internacional e da Defesa; Analisar casos de arquiteturas sub-regionais no campo da Segurança Internacional e da Defesa.
Bibliografia:
BALDWIN, David. The Concept of Security, Review of International Studies, 23 (1), January 1997.
FARRELL, Theo. Constructivism Security Studies: portrait of a research program. IN: The International Studies Review, vol. 4, n. 1, 2002, pp. 217-231.
BALZACQ, Thierry. The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 11(2), 2005. p. 171–201.
BECK, Ulrich. La sociedad del riesgo mundial. Barcelona: Paidós, 2008. Introdução e capítulo 11.
BERNAL-MEZA, Raúl. Argentina y Brasil en la Política Internacional: regionalismo y Mercosur (estrategias, cooperación y factores de tensión). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. v. 51, n. 2, 2008. p. 154-178.
BIGO, Didier. When Two Become One. Internal and External Securitizations in Europe. In: KELSTRUP, Marten; WILLIAMS, Michael C. (Eds), International relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration. London: Routledge, 2000.
HOWORTH, J. Discourse, Ideas, and Epistemic Communities in European Security and Defence Policy. West European Politics, Vol.27, No.2 (March 2004), pp.211–234.
BUZAN, Barry; WAEVER, Ole. Security Complex: a theory of international security. In: Regions and powers. The structure of international security. Cap 3. p. 40-82.
CAVELTY, Myriam Dunn; KAUFMANN, Mareile; KRISTENSEN, Kristian Søby, Resilience and (in)security: Practices, subjects, temporalities, Security Dialogue, 2015, Vol. 46(1), p. 3–14.
CROSS, Mai’a. Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later, Review of International Studies, v. 39, 01, January 2013, p. 137 – 160.
DIAMINT, R. Regionalismo y posicionamiento suramericano: UNASUR y ALBA. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, n.101, 2013, p. 55-79.
FLEMES, Daniel.; NOLTE, D. WEHNER, Leslie. Una comunidad de seguridad regional en formación: la unasur y su Consejo de Defensa. Estudios Internacionales 170 (2011), Instituto de Estudios Internacionales - Universidad de Chile.
GOH, Evelyn. Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia, International Security, v. 32, n. 3, 2007/08, p. 113–157.
HAACKE, Jürgen; WILLIAMS, Paul. Regional Arrangements and Security Challenges: A Comparative Analysis, Crisis States Working Paper, 2009. HURRELL, Andrew. O Ressurgimento do Regionalismo na Política Mundial. Contexto Internacional, n. 17, vol. 1, 1995, 23-44.
HUYSMANS, Jef. Language and the mobilisation of security expectations. The normative dilemma of speaking and writing security. Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, workshop Redefining Security, Mannheim, 26-31. March 1999.
KATZENSTEIN, Peter J.; OKAWARA, Nobuo. Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism, International Security, v. 26, n. 3, 2001-2002, p. 153-185.
KELLY, Robert. Security Theory in the ‘‘New Regionalism”, International Studies Review, 2007, v. 9, 197–229.
KOWERT, Paul; LEGRO, Jeffrey. Norms, Identity, and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise. In: KATZENSTEIN, Peter J. (org.). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
KRAUSE, Keith; WILLIAMS, Michael. From Strategy to Security: foudantions of Critical Security Studies. In: KRAUSE, Keith; WILLIAMS, Michael. Critical Security Studies (eds). London: Routledge, 1997. p. 33-60.
WYN-JONES, Richard. On emancipation. In: BOOTH, Ken. Critical Security Studies and World Politics. Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 2005.
McSWEENEY, Bill. Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Cap. 6. The social constructionist approach.
NEOCLEOUS, Mark. Security, Liberty and the Myth of Balance: Towards a Critique of Security Politics, Contemporary Political Theory, 2007, 6, p. 131–149.
POULIOT, Vicent. The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. International Organization, Volume 62, Issue 02, April 2008, p 257 – 288.
ROWLEY, Christina; WELDES, Jutta. The evolution of international security studies and the everyday: Suggestions from the Buffyverse, Security Dialogue, 2012, 43(6) 513–530.
SAINT-PIERRE, Héctor La Defensa en la Política Exterior del Brasil: el Consejo Suramericano y la Estrategia Nacional de Defensa. Real Instituto Elcano, Documento de Trabajo 50/2009.
SARCINSCHI, Alexandra; BĂHNĂREAN, Cristian. Globalization, Regionalization, National Security. Strategic Impact, Issue: 1, 2013, p. 23-32. VÄYRYNEN, Raimo. Regionalism: Old and new, International Studies Review, 2003, v. 5, 25–51